Click for Part I and Part II.
OK, the last two posts only covered about two months’ worth of time. I’ll try to summarize the rest of it a bit better. If you have more questions, ask them in the comments. Remember this was about three-and-a-half years ago, in the spring of 2003 when Cutie was just conceived and Ant was in preschool. Bud was somewhere in the middle, having fun playing with all the kids I watched while their parents toured Mrs. B’s school.
The day after that big group toured the mother charter school, I realized that the whole project was way too big and way over my head, and I began pleading with the Lord for direction. I totally felt unqualified to write a large legal document or to set up a non-proft corporation.
For the corporation, we needed to have officers. Chris and her husband, I’ll call them Mr. and Mrs. C, came to my mind to be co-presidents, and another man who had already begun looking for land for the new school came to my mind for vice-president. Since I had my secretarial degree
, I thought I could handle being the corporation’s secretary. I called the officers and asked them if they would be willing to serve in those capacities, and could we get together for a meeting that day. They said yes, and I felt awesome relief. On the way to the meeting, I saw my friend K who said she enjoys public speaking, and would be willing to help if we needed to make presentations or talk to the press at any time. Little did I know that we would be needing her expertise soon and often.
At the meeting, I gave all the info I had gathered to the Cs. They took it and ran with it. They called the district (who, by law at that time, would need to be our authorizer) and asked when we needed to turn in our petition to be able to open for the 2004-05 school year. The answer was a deadline two weeks away! Oh, and by the way, the board will certainly be more apt to approve us if we have the school focus on fine arts. And we shouldn’t even mention that we want the program of the mother school, the newest charter school at the other side of the district is already doing that, and it’s becoming such a controversial method (it seems that people either really love it or really hate it, and the haters were beginning to go on a rampage). In order to complete the charter document on time, we (K and a committee of parents) got a copy of three other charters using the same educational program and with their permission, we copied and pasted bits and pieces from each one and then added how the school would be focused on the fine arts. While we did this, the Cs were trying to build a relationship with the school district and research all our questions.
The charter document was completed within two weeks, and it was cross-referenced with the state charter school law to make sure we covered every requirement. When the officers went to submit it to the district office, we talked with the public liason again. He mentioned that the district was wanting to set up a fine arts magnet school on our side of the district, and how would we like to just collaborate with them to make it happen? We said we would think about it, but asked to be put on next week’s (June 2003) meeting agenda of the district’s board of directors anyway.
When we appeared before the board, they were less-than cordial and began about eight months of stall tactics and political games. They said they wanted to make a district policy regarding charter schools before they would consider our petition and could we help them, but they never returned our phone calls wondering when the committee was going to meet; they wanted us to submit our full curriculum before they would approve us, but no other charter school had ever planned their full curriculum in the application stage (however, we did provide several thick binders full of examples of tests and lesson that would be used in each grade); they didn’t think it was legal to provide priority to founder’s children, but while the law did not grant priority to founders, it did not prohibit priority either; they wanted our primary attendance boundary to include the whole large district, but they had just announced their new fine arts magnet school that had a primary attendance area comparable to ours; oh, and the state education board just passed some new rules regarding charters so the petition needs to be re-written to be in compliance with those rules, so we re-wrote it and omitted the now-obsolete arts focus while we were at it.
In the beginning of 2004, while we were still in the midst of these battles with the district, we joined forces with other charter school supporters and lobbied the state legislature to change the charter law to provide another entity through which charters could be authorized if the local district was uncooperative; and to allow priority for founders’ children, the number of which could not exceed 10% of the whole student body. Cutie was born the previous fall, and I remember taking her with me to various hearings and debates on the bill and hiding in the back of the audience in the senate or house chamber to breastfeed.
We tasted a bit of victory when the new charter law was passed in March 2004, but it was way too late to even consider opening for the 2004-05 year. Plus, we were told we needed to start the process over with the district to follow the provisions of the new law. We almost quit. Our frustrations with the system were so great that they spilled through our tears in our board meetings. They almost broke us. However, the new law also provided specific deadlines, something like the district had only 30 days from the receipt of the petition to hold a hearing, then they had only 30 more days to either approve or deny us. If the district denied our petition, or if they didn’t meet the deadlines, we could then seek approval from the state chartering entity. If we were approved through the state, the school would then be like it’s own independent district, subject to all the reports, audits, and other requirements of any other district in the state. But if we were denied, that would be the end of the road.
Well, through the encouragement of all our charter allies, we bucked up and went through the motions of petitioning the district again. They began their games again, but we basically demanded denial or approval of the petition. They denied it. Hoo-ray! Off we go to the state entity for approval. Our first meeting with them was a fiasco, though. Despite the 11 professionally bound copies of the newly revised and perfected charter we provided to the secretary of the directors, each director had a copy of a version of our charter that was over a year old (before it was revised for the "new rules") and they had already done a legal review of it. Of course, it wasn’t in compliance. Since there was obviously a mix up, we were not denied but we were asked to come back the next month so they could do the legal review of the correct petition. I was enraged. When I get enraged I bawl, but I tried to keep my composure as I asked that secretary how, exactly, did things get so screwed up. I don’t think she gave me a straight answer, but that’s ok, because I wasn’t listening anyway.
We did go back the next month, and the state approved our charter and the school was sceduled to open for the 2005-06 year. Luckily the neighboring city’s school district was dwindling in numbers and in order to attract more students, they decided to change the format of one of their elementary schools to Mrs. B’s program. Ant was able to attend first grade there in 2004-05–and the commute wasn’t bad, especially since we carpooled with the Cs and other parents involved in our project.
And now started the fun part where we interviewed and hired our administrator (who had been one of our advisors) and a clerk of the board. Then we screened teacher candidates for the principal to interview and hire. Then we held the lottery to randomly choose who would get to attend the school. Although Ant was covered under that now-legal founder’s clause, I felt relieved and amazed and blessed that his name was the first one randomly pulled out of the bucket for his grade. I still get tears in my eyes when I think of it–it’s like validation from the Lord.
After the lottery was finished, I felt like I had contributed as much as I could and decided to resign the next day to focus more on my family who, I admit, I neglected. Mr. and Mrs. C have continued serving on the school board while other stalwart parents have become faculty. I am happily volunteering in the classrooms once a week.
The charter school (currently serving one class each of grades K-8, but will be adding one grade per year until there’s a full high school) is housed in a local church which we currently share with the congregation until we can obtain the financing to purchase it outright, so the congregation can build their new facility. The school successfully completed its first year of operation in June and is back in session for the second year. The principal is now giving tours of the safe and challenging method of instruction to others who want choices in their children’s education. Unfortunately our waiting list is a mile long. SOMEBODY ought to start another charter school in their neck of the woods.
And that, my friends, is just the beginning.